Cases 61 - 70 of 102
McFadden v. Annucci et al
as 9:2015cv01354
Plaintiff:
Reginald McFadden
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Jr., Maureen Boll, Jeff McKoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Porter
as 1:2015cv02927
Petitioner:
Willie Lamont Hicks
Respondent:
Daniel D. Porter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wilson et al v. Porter
as 2:2015cv02702
Plaintiff:
Carol A. Wilson and Trustees of the Ohio Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Plan, Ohio Operating Engineers Pension Fund, Ohio Operating Engineers Apprenticeship and Training Fund and Ohio Operating Engineers Educatio
Defendant:
Rodney D. Porter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
American Automobile Association, (Incorporated) v. Porter
as 6:2015cv00631
Plaintiff:
American Automobile Association, (Incorporated)
Defendant:
William D. Porter
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127
Montgomery v. Hardy et al
as 5:2015cv00294
Plaintiff:
Thomas R Montgomery
Defendant:
Windle Hardy, Mike Lennier, Jack D Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chen et al v. Xpresspa at Term. 4 JFK, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01347
Defendant:
Xpresspa at Term. 4 JFK, LLC, Xpresspa Atlanta Terminal A, LLC, Xpressa Atlanta Terminal C, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Chen, Xiao Ling Chen, Zeng Biao Teng and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Porter et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv31161
Plaintiff:
Lisa D. Porter and Bobby L. Porter
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Porter
as 2:2014cv04262
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jock D. Porter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Porter v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv00557
Plaintiff:
Stacey D. Porter
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Porter v. Social Seurity Administration
as 1:2014cv04439
Plaintiff:
Senita D. Porter
Defendant:
Social Seurity Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
