Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 94
Ortiz v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2013cv01757
Plaintiff: Daniel Ortiz
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ortiz v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as LAW/6:13-cv-01757
Plaintiff: Daniel Ortiz
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and others
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1662
Plaintiff: Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Akil Sachveda and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Ibrahim Turkmen, Akhil Sachdeva, Anser Mehmood and others
Defendant - Appellee: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-999
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant: James Sherman
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1003
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant: Salvatore LoPresti, MDC Captain
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1002
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant: Michael Zenk, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center
Turkmen v. Ashcroft We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-981
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor: Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant: Warden Dennis Hasty, former Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center(MDC), James Sherman, Michael Zenk, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center and others
Carrillo, v. Hickenlooper, et al., We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv02034
Plaintiff: Alfonso A. Carrillo, Augustin Telles, Raymundo Castillo and others
Defendant: John W. Hickenlooper, John W. Sutters, Elizabeth Oldham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz-Martinez v. USA
as 4:2012cv00642
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Daniel Ortiz-Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ortiz-Ortiz v. United States Of America
as 4:2012cv00060
Petitioner: Jesus Daniel Ortiz-Ortiz
Respondent: United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?