Cases 61 - 70 of 111
United States of America v. Diaz-Diaz
as 2:2018mj30174
Defendant:
David Diaz-Diaz
Plaintiff:
United States of America
DIAZ GUAL v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv04593
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
317) 237-1000 (fax:
John T. Schlafer, John T. Schlafer and John T. Schlafer
Plaintiff:
ANGEL DAVID DIAZ GUAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Diaz v. GBJ, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv03401
Plaintiff:
David Diaz
Defendant:
GBJ, Inc., TBL Group, Inc. and Echo Tours & Charters, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. David Diaz, Jr.
as 17-30294
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID DIAZ, JR.
Juan Hernandez et al v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02729
Defendant:
Does and Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Plaintiff:
Juan Hernandez and David Diaz Noriega
Juan Hernandez et al v. Swift Transportation Corporation, et al
as 2:2017cv02427
Defendant:
Does, Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC and Swift Transportation Corporation
Plaintiff:
Juan Hernandez and David Diaz Noriega
Diaz v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 1:2017cv20662
Plaintiff:
David Diaz
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00154
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robert Keys v. Candace Torres, et al
as 16-41518
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DANIEL KEYS
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER II CANDACE TORRES, CLERK 3 KIESHA COLLINS, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE - INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION and others
Cho et al v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2016cv07961
Plaintiff:
Sung Cho , Nagle Washrite LLC , David Diaz and others
Defendant:
City Of New York , Bill de Blasio , New York City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
