Cases 61 - 70 of 1,046
The New York Times Company v. Department of Defense et al
as 1:2023cv05037
Plaintiff:
The New York Times Company
Defendant:
Department of Defense, Department of State and Drug Enforcement Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Alvarez-Valencia v. Drug Enforcement Administration
as 1:2023cv02859
Plaintiff:
Rafael Alvarez-Valencia
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1528
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Coleman v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2023cv14166
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Coleman
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Drug Enforcement Administration, U.S. Parole Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Postmeds, Inc. v. Drug Enforcement Administration
as 1:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
Postmeds, Inc.
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv01690
Plaintiff:
AARON GREENSPAN and NO PARTY
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITES STATES ATTORNEYS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Neil Anand, et al v. HHS, et al
as 23-5119
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Neil Anand
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Lesly Pompy
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Health and Human Services and Drug Enforcement Administration
Morris & Dickson v. DEA
as 23-60284
Petitioner:
Morris & Dickson Company, L.L.C.
Respondent:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Tysheed Davis v. United States Marines, et al
as 23-1606
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYSHEED DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARINES, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
