Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Flores v. The Hertz Corporation
as 7:2009cv00087
Plaintiff:
Francisco Flores and Francisco Flores
Defendant:
The Hertz Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
USA v. Francisco Flores-Babichi
as 08-10510
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCISCO FLORES-BABICHI
USA v. Francisco Flores-Babichi
as 08-10508
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCISCO FLORES-BABICHI
Flores v. Bally Total Fitness Corporation
as 3:2008cv05158
Plaintiff:
Francisco Flores, Francisco Flores and Francisco Flores
Defendant:
Bally Total Fitness Corporation, Bally Total Fitness Corporation and Bally Total Fitness Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Flores v. CSS Clean Star Services of Central Florida, Inc.
as 6:2008cv01729
Plaintiff:
Francisco Flores
Defendant:
CSS Clean Star Services of Central Florida, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Flores v. Govea Masonry LLC
as 3:2008cv01703
Plaintiff:
Francisco Flores and Francisco Flores
Defendant:
Govea Masonry LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA v. Castillo-Recinos
as 08-20572
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARIO RENE CASTILLO-RECINOS, also known as Fernando Rene Garcia, also known as Carmalino Perez, also known as Mario Rene Castillo Recinos, also known as Fernando Renee Perez, also known as Francisco Flores, also known as Fernando Rene Perez
Torres v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv07100
Plaintiff:
Wilfredo Torres
Defendant:
The City of New York, The New York City Police Department, Victor Lebron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hubahib v. Kane
as 2:2007cv01064
Petitioner:
Francisco Flores Hubahib
Respondent:
Katherine Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
