Cases 61 - 70 of 1,394
Wang v. Capri Holdings Limited et al
as 1:2023cv08379
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Capri Holdings Limited, John D. Idol, Marilyn Crouther and others
O'Dell v. Capri Holdings Limited et al
as 1:2023cv08268
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Capri Holdings Limited, John D. Idol, Marilyn Crouther and others
GIBBONS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02702
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS L GIBBONS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) Metcalf v. Aguazo et al
as 1:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Denzell Metcalf
Defendant:
Jose Aguazo, Albert Gibbons, Tai Ban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tepe v. Corker et al
as 3:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Clifton L. Corker, Travis R. McDonough, Katherine A. Crytzer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
GIBBONS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00436
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GIBBONS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DYSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv00525
Plaintiff:
GIBBONS DYSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALFORD et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
RICHARD B. ALFORD, KATHLEEN A. ALFORD, DONNA MARIE BREAULT and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Passarelli #954240 v. Gibbons
as 1:2023cv00858
Petitioner:
Adam Lee Passarelli #954240
Respondent:
Tracey Gibbons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
