Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 120
CARROLL v. JOHN BROOKS RECOVERY CENTER et al
as 1:2014cv02662
Plaintiff: ESTHER CARROLL
Defendant: JOHN BROOKS RECOVERY CENTER and JOHN FLANAGAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Muhammad et al v. Moore et al
as 2:2014cv02081
Plaintiff: Miykael Muhammad and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel.
Defendant: John Brooks Moore, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign Police Department, University of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandy Bell, et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc, et al
as 13-17602
Plaintiff - Appellee: SANDY BELL and MARTIN GAMA
Defendant - Appellant: HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC and JOHN BROOKS
In re: John Brook
as 13-30954
Movant: In re: JOHN BROOKS
Brooks v. Cain et al
as 2:2013cv05266
Plaintiff: John Brooks
Defendant: Burl Cain and James M LeBlanc
Respondent: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-13538
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
SUMPTER v. DPH HOLDINGS, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01024
Defendant: JOHN BROOKS, BUTZEL LONG, P.C., DPH HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Plaintiff: JAMES B. SUMPTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sandy Bell, et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc, et al
as 13-80110
Plaintiff - Respondent: SANDY BELL and MARTIN GAMA
Defendant - Petitioner: HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC and JOHN BROOKS
Brook v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 1:2012cv10140
Plaintiff: V. John Brook
Defendant: Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv10119
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?