Cases 61 - 70 of 99
Futch v. Rathman et al
as 1:2012cv00797
Petitioner:
John Randall Futch
Respondent:
John T Rathman and John Charles Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BELL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv48882
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. BELL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BELL v. BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67306
Plaintiff:
JOHN EDWIN BELL
Defendant:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., 3M BUSINESS PRODUCT SALES, INC., PFIZER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees et al v. Bell
as 3:2011cv02781
Plaintiff:
Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees , Les Proteau , Charles Del Monte and others
Defendant:
John William Bell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Bell v. Bayer CropScience, Inc., et al
as 4:2011cv03300
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience, Inc.,, 3M Business Product Sales, Inc., Pfizer, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Edwin Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bell v. Reynolds
as 2:2011cv00531
Petitioner:
John X Bell
Respondent:
Cecilia Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bell v. Shearouse et al
as 2:2011cv00506
Plaintiff:
John X Bell
Defendant:
Daniel E Shearouse, Liz Godard, Mary S Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. South Carolina
as 2:2011cv00406
Petitioner:
John X Bell
Respondent:
Warden Kershaw Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Bell v. Doris Cooke
as 10-7593
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN JAMES BELL, a/k/a Omar Abdel-Al-Mumit
Defendant - Appellee:
DORIS ANN COOKE, RN, DOCTOR BEINOR, P. HOUGH, Inmate Grievance Coordinator and others
Bell v. Amason et al
as 2:2010cv02085
Plaintiff:
John James Bell
Defendant:
Cathrine A Amason , Kamisha Miller , Pamela Hough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
