Cases 61 - 70 of 72
Collins v. Purdue University et al
as 4:2009cv00012
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Collins, III
Defendant:
Purdue University, Purdue University Board of Trustees of, Purdue University Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Evans v. Astrue
as 2:2008cv00982
Plaintiff:
Susan K. Evans
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Bobby Walker v. Bentley Evans, et al
as 08-56814
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY D. WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
BENTLEY K. EVANS, VALICIA EVANS, Owners, NANCY WHITE, Director of Occupancy and others
Patterson et al v. City of Akron, Ohio et al
as 5:2008cv01300
Plaintiff:
Brian D. Patterson, Brian D. Patterson, Derek J. Patterson and others
Defendant:
City of Akron, Ohio, Timothy Givens, M. Rinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brian K Evans v. Dick Clark Productions, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00800
Plaintiff:
Brian K Evans
Defendant:
Dick Clark Productions, Inc. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Dandrea Produce, Inc. v. 1 Source Marketing Group, Inc., et al
as 1:2007cv01846
Plaintiff:
Dandrea Produce, Inc. and Val-Pro, Inc.
Defendant:
1 Source Marketing Group, Inc., Sunriver Trading Company Limited, Evans Sales, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Presley v. City of Blackshear et al
as 5:2007cv00094
Plaintiff:
Brenda Presley and Brenda Presley
Defendant:
City of Blackshear, Blackshear Police Department, James Mock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv02418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
Guanill v. Fuller et al
as 3:2007cv03315
Plaintiff:
Fernando Roy Guanill
Defendant:
G. M. Fuller, K. Evans and B. Walls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
