Cases 61 - 70 of 190
AMPONSAH et al v. NIELSEN et al
as 1:2018cv01633
Defendant:
KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, District Director SARAH TAYLOR, L. FRANCIS CISSNA and others
Plaintiff:
KWAME AMPONSAH, DIANE WEBB and DIANE L. WEBB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Webb v. Changzhou Nanxiashu Tool Co Ltd
as 6:2018mc00252
Plaintiff:
Vincent L Webb
Defendant:
Changzhou Nanxiashu Tool Co Ltd
Webb v. Changzhou Nanxiashu Tool Co Ltd
as 6:2018cv01903
Plaintiff:
Vincent L Webb
Defendant:
Changzhou Nanxiashu Tool Co Ltd
Interested Party:
Piggy Backer Co Inc
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Webb v. Changzhou Nanxiashu Tool Co Ltd
as 6:2018mc00236
Plaintiff:
Vincent L Webb
Defendant:
Changzhou Nanxiashu Tool Co Ltd
Lynch v. Brooks et al
as 2:2018cv00333
Plaintiff:
Carlton W. Lynch
Defendant:
Dr. M. Brooks, Armor Health Corr. Inc, Dr. Autrur L. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb et al v. Trailer City et al
as 2:2018mc00387
Plaintiff:
Vincent L. Webb
Defendant:
Trailer City , Dan E. Walker and Changzhou Nanxiashu Tool Co
Petitioner:
Northstar Trailers Acquisition
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Vincent Webb v. Changzhou Nanxiashu Tool Co.
as 18-35323
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VINCENT L. WEBB
Defendant - Appellant:
CHANGZHOU NANXIASHU TOOL CO., LTD., a foreign corporation
WEBB v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2018cv05763
Plaintiff:
RICKY L. WEBB
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, MERCK & CO. INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aundra Jackson v. Bryan Gordy, et al
as 18-40308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUNDRA B. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN BRYAN GORDY, Garza East Unit, ASSISTANT WARDEN PHONSO J. RAYFORD, Garza East Unit, CAPTAIN MARTINEZ, Garza East Unit and others
Williamson v. Williamson
as 4:2018cv00003
Plaintiff:
Norris Williamson
Defendant:
Diana Lewis Williamson and Robert L Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
