Cases 61 - 70 of 166
Mateen-El v. Bell et al
as 3:2018cv00224
Plaintiff:
Aziz Mateen-El
Defendant:
W. Robert Bell, P. Lytle, R. Andrew Murray and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
McDaniel v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools et al
as 3:2018cv00205
Plaintiff:
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel
Defendant:
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, Patricia Falk and others
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
McNeill v. Jhonson et al
as 3:2018cv00188
Plaintiff:
James C. McNeill
Defendant:
FNU Jhonson, FNU Grahmn, Jhon Herring and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Lane v. Nationwide Affinity Insurance Company of America
as 5:2017cv00230
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Lane
Defendant:
Nationwide Affinity Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baye v. United States of America et al
as 5:2017ct03265
Plaintiff:
Thomas Baye
Defendant:
United States of America, Warden FCI Butner Low, Butner Food Services Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stout v. USA
as 5:2017cv00199
Petitioner:
Jimmy Lane Stout
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1106 OLD STONE LANE, KERNERSVILLE, FORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON
as 1:2017cv00756
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
1106 OLD STONE LANE, KERNERSVILLE, FORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
LANE v. POOLE
as 1:2017cv00636
Plaintiff:
MILTON LEWIS LANE, JR.
Defendant:
KATIE POOLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
