Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 95
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00264
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-15668
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv08250
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
SEXTON v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv58457
Plaintiff: RICHARD M SEXTON
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Buggs v. Almond et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2011cv03682
Plaintiff: Dynassus Nual Buggs
Defendant: Brad Almond, Charles R McLone, John H England, Jr and others
Miscellaneou: staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lavender v. McMillian et al
as 4:2011cv02669
Plaintiff: Aubrey Bernard Lavender
Defendant: Dennis McMillian and Edmund M Sexton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buggs v. Almond et al
as 7:2011cv01396
Plaintiff: Dynassus Nual Buggs
Defendant: Brad Almond, Charles R. Malone, John H. England, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berryhill v. Jones et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv00307
Plaintiff: Lavern Berryhill
Defendant: Justin Jones, Randall G Workman, Linda Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berryhill v. Payne, et al
as 10-7075
Plaintiff - Appellant: LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES H PAYNE, U.S. District Judge, FRANK H. SEAY, U.S. District Judge, RANDALL WORKMAN, Warden, OSP and others
Sexton v. Dills
as 2:2010cv00401
Plaintiff: William M. Sexton
Defendant: Johnathan Dills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?