Cases 61 - 70 of 183
Librace v. Martin et al
as 4:2016cv00057
Plaintiff:
David Librace
Defendant:
Mark Martin , Republican Party of Arkansas Executive Commitee , Ted Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Tolbert v. Katz et al
as 4:2015cv10230
Plaintiff:
Richard Cordell Tolbert
Defendant:
Steven Katz , Mark Martin and Markevious Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Moore, et al v. Mark Martin
as 15-3558
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark Moore
Plaintiff:
Michael Harrod and William C. Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark Martin, in his official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Arkansas
Frederick Smith v. Democratic Party Arkansas, et al
as 15-3535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fred Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Democratic Party Arkansas, Will Bond, Individual Capacity Chairman Democratic Party Arkansas, Candace Martin, Individual Capacity Spokeswoman DPA and others
John Busker v. WABTEC Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv08194
Plaintiff:
John Busker
Defendant:
Does, Mark Martin and WABTEC Corporation
Libertarian Party of Arkansas et al v. Martin
as 4:2015cv00635
Plaintiff:
Libertarian Party of Arkansas , Kristin Vaughn , Robert Chris Hayes and others
Defendant:
Mark Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Smith v. Arkansas Board of Election Commissioners et al
as 4:2015cv00521
Plaintiff:
Fred Smith
Defendant:
Arkansas Board of Election Commissioners, Cross County Elections Commission, Crittenden County Election Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Scott et al v. Orleans Parish School Board et al
as 2:2015cv03119
Plaintiff:
Tamika Haywood Scott and Wilbert Scott
Defendant:
Orleans Parish School Board, Mark Martin, Michelleh Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1710
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
