Cases 61 - 70 of 327
Wong v. Golden Nugget Online Gaming, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv09331
Plaintiff:
Peter Wong
Defendant:
Golden Nugget Online Gaming, Inc., Tilman J. Fertitta, Richard H. Liem and others
Sokolowski v. Kuber et al
as 2:2021cv01245
Plaintiff:
Michael Steven Sokolowski
Defendant:
Dr Kuber, Dr Ribault and Stephen McCullen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEVENS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv67116
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVENS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stevens v. Mendocino County Superior Court
as 3:2021cv07604
Petitioner:
Dean Michael Stevens
Respondent:
Mendocino County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Durocher #679049 v. Tarnow
as 1:2021cv00729
Plaintiff:
Michael Steven Joseph Durocher #679049
Defendant:
James Edward Tarnow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Aaren et al
as 5:2021cv05531
Plaintiff:
Dean Michael Stevens
Defendant:
Jeffry Aaren, Mary LeClarr, City of Mendocino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dougherty v. BSI Financial Services, Inc et al
as 4:2021cv02186
Plaintiff:
Jzavela-Arethea Dougherty
Defendant:
BSI Financial Services, Inc. and Michael Steven Dougherty
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Michael Gorbey v. Geisinger Eye Center Owners &, et al
as 21-2245
Defendant / Appellee:
GEISINGER EYE CENTER OWNERS & RUETERS, A. DUTTRY, Health Service Supervisor USPLewisburg, GAUSTPH, Mail Room Supervisor USP-Lewisburg and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Michael Gorbey v. A. King, et al
as 21-2246
Defendant / Appellee:
HICKS, Lieutenant, Unit Case Manager USP-Lewisburg, MARR, Unit Counselor USP-Lewisburg, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Michael Gorbey v. Warden Lewisburg USP
as 21-2243
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
