Cases 61 - 70 of 88
Emrit v. Trump et al
as 4:2019cv40005
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Commerce, Federal Trade Commission, President Donald Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv25444
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Morton v. Trump et al
as 1:2018cv25230
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Nathan Morton
Defendant:
Vice President Pence and President Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv00619
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions/Medical League Concepts, Director GEO Group Inc, Attorney General Matthew Whitaker and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomason Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Evans v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv00610
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions/Medical League Concepts, Secretary of State Washington DC and Texas, President Donald Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Boutros v. UPS et al
as 3:2018cv02388
Defendant:
UPS, UPS/Tim Davis, The previous presidents of the USA led by the current president Donald Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Zinia Ezzet Boutros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv14459
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2018cv14458
Defendant:
RAS BARAKA, NYPD, FBI NEWARK and others
Plaintiff:
APRIL DENISE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2018cv14460
Defendant:
NYPD, SENATOR CORY BOOKER, GOVERNOR PHIL MURPHY and others
Plaintiff:
APRIL DENISE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Armstead v. Trump
as 6:2018cv01380
Defendant:
President Donald Trump
Plaintiff:
Brenda C. Armstead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
