Cases 61 - 70 of 199
Griffin v. Manley et al
as 9:2016cv00148
Petitioner:
Richard L. Griffin
Respondent:
James A. Manley, Robert L. Zimmerman, Timothy Charles Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JACKSON v. JONES et al.
as 3:2016cv00551
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE JACKSON
Defendant:
JULIE L JONES, CORIZON HEALTH INC, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schrum v. Rummel et al
as 3:2016cv00306
Plaintiff:
Darrell Schrum
Defendant:
Arnie Rummel , Brad Whelan, Pyramid Transportation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Ives v. Michelle Nichols, et al
as 16-15342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK W. IVES
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE NICHOLS, Nurse, WARDEN, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Jose Garcia v. Florida Department of Correcti, et al
as 16-15235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE RAFAEL GARCIA
Defendant - Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, W. D. RUMMEL, SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ANNEX and others
Reid et al v. Ebbert et al
as 1:2016cv01403
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Reid, Kareem Hassan Milhouse, Eric Houston and others
Defendant:
J. Ebbert, Jeana Mitterling, M. Barner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Javado Thompson v. M. Nichols, et al
as 16-11236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAVADO AUDRIC THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
M. NICHOLS, ARNP and W. D. RUMMEL, MD CHO
GIBBONS v. MONTGOMERTY COUNTY et al
as 2:2016cv01233
Plaintiff:
JOHN GIBBONS
Defendant:
MONTGOMERTY COUNTY, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JULIO ALGARIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUMMEL v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00699
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE RUMMEL
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUIZ v. RUMMEL et al
as 3:2016cv00017
Petitioner:
Carlos Ruiz
Respondent:
W. D. Rummel, Nichols and RODRIGO VIVAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
