Cases 61 - 70 of 72
Rolling Frito-Lay Sales LP v. Rebecca Stover, et al
as 12-15393
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROLLING FRITO-LAY SALES LP, a Delaware Limited partnership
Defendant - Appellant:
REBECCA STOVER
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID MONTIEL, DBA On-Auk-Mor Trade Center, AUK-MOR and SALT RIVER PIMA-MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY COURT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bernstein et al v. Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP
as 2:2012cv00608
Plaintiff:
Eric B. Bernstein and Rosemarie M. Cua
Defendant:
Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bolton v. Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP et al
as 3:2011cv00734
Plaintiff:
LaDarrian Bolton
Defendant:
Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP and Thomas M. Dodd, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sidney Elliott v. Rolling Frito Lay Sales LP et al
as 8:2011cv01730
Defendant:
Does, Frito Lay Inc, Frito Lay Sales Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Sidney Elliott
Rolling Frito-Lay Sales LP v. Stover et al
as 2:2011cv01361
Plaintiff:
Rolling Frito-Lay Sales LP
Defendant:
Rebecca Stover, David Montiel, Auk-Mor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kashani v. Frito-Lay, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv50170
Defendant:
Frito-Lay, Inc. , Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, L.P. and Costco Wholesale Corporation
Plaintiff:
Zahra Kashani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv01145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rundle v. Klote et al
as 2:2010cv04191
Plaintiff:
Sara J. Rundle
Defendant:
Tony Klote and Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
