Cases 61 - 70 of 876
CAFISO et al v. BRANCH et al
as 2:2022cv01255
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, HENRY BRANCH, JOAN BETTY SCHWARZ and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CAFISO and MEGAN CAFISO
3Rd Party Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
WHITE v. SEDGWICK CMS HOLDINGS INC et al
as 2:2022cv00731
Plaintiff:
TOMIHA WHITE
Defendant:
SEDGWICK CMS HOLDINGS INC and SCHWARZ PARTNERS SHORT TERM DISABILITY PLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Colonial Licensing LLC v. Rohde & Schwarz USA, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00246
Plaintiff:
Colonial Licensing LLC
Defendant:
Rohde & Schwarz USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement
COMMVAULT SYSTEMS, INC., v. SCHWARZ
as 3:2022cv00306
Plaintiff:
COMMVAULT SYSTEMS, INC.,
Defendant:
BRAD SCHWARZ
TAYLOR v. FILIPI et al
as 3:2021cv04691
Plaintiff:
LARRY JAMES TAYLOR
Defendant:
FILIPI, SWANSON, ZULLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joel Barcelona v. H Burkes, et al
as 21-14285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOEL BARCELONA
Defendant / Appellee:
H BURKES, OFC, W SCHWARZ, MAJ and A. KEATON
Schwarz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv01570
Plaintiff:
Amy Elizabeth Schwarz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Castleman v. Minot, City of et al
as 1:2021cv00198
Plaintiff:
Brent A. Castleman
Defendant:
Minot, City of, Ward, County of, North Dakota, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sister E. Jones-Bey v. Chen
as 21-2495
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sister E. Jones-Bey
Defendant / Appellee:
Pamela K. Chen, Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, on behalf of U.S. Attorney General, Attorney General Letitia James, on behalf of the State of New York and others
SCHWARZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv54959
Plaintiff:
LEAH SCHWARZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
