Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 73
Darnall v. Napel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv12648
Petitioner: Taz Darnall
Respondent: Robert Napel
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00112
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02251
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv00108
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United States of America v. Williams (Yeagley)
as 10-2588
Appellee USA: United States of America
Defendant: Ramel Williams
Defendant - Appellant: Christopher Yeagley, AKA Taz
US v. Waltez Latham We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-6759
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: WALTEZ JEMEL LATHAM, a/k/a Taz
Carol Morris v. City of Midland, Texas, et al
as 09-51052
Plaintiff - Appellant: CAROL JOHNENE MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS, CHUCK SWALLOW, Individually and His Official Capacity, DAVID WAYLAND, Individually and His Official Capacity and others
Paris et al v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 4:2009cv00162
Plaintiff: Ronald Taz Paris, Ronald Taz Paris, Rachael Paris and others
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Rapid Filling Services, LLC v. Zahir et al
as 1:2009cv03740
Plaintiff: Rapid Filling Services, LLC
Defendant: Twyar Zahir and Taz Tax, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Esteban Ibarra, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-50627
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: ESTEBAN IBARRA, JR., also known as Taz

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?