Cases 61 - 70 of 100
Dominic Diaz v. Radcliff, et al
as 26-2624
Plaintiff:
DOMINIC DIAZ
Defendant:
C.O. RADCLIFF, individual and official capacity, C.O. OHLER, individual and official capacity, TINA WALKER, Correction Officer;individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Douglas Symmes, Jr. v. North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections
as 26-6715
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
MR. COLAIRE, MS. SYKES, MR. JERKINS and others
Jones v. Myrtho et al
as 4:2026cv05083
Plaintiff:
Tina Jones
Defendant:
Joseph Myrtho and Maric Transportation Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Thompson v. Kentucky State Reformatory et al
as 3:2026cv00500
Plaintiff:
Deporres R. Thompson
Defendant:
Kentucky State Reformatory, Wellpath, Tina Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Fisher et al
as 5:2026cv01585
Defendant:
Karen LNU, Desmond Madwell, Jeffery Kraugh and others
Plaintiff:
Tina Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Flores v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 2:2026cv00215
Plaintiff:
Tina Flores
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, ABC Corporation (1-2) and John Doe(s) 1-2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Easa v. Norco, Inc., et al.
as 26-4090
Plaintiff:
TINA EASA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
NORCO, INC., an Idaho Corporation and DOES 1-20
WEBSTER v PHARMACIA AND UPJOHN COMPANY LLC et al
as 3:2026cv04404
Plaintiff:
TINA WEBSTER
Defendant:
PHARMACIA & UPJOHN COMPANY LLC and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
