Cases 61 - 70 of 124
Doe v. Paychex, Inc.
as 20-431
Defendant / Appellee:
Paychex, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
USI Insurance Services LLC and USI Insurance Services of Connecticut, Inc.
Anderson et al v. USI Advantage Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv05582
Plaintiff:
Roger Maldonado, Jameson Taylor Anderson and Dean Anderson
Defendant:
USI Advantage Corp. and USI Insurance Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Randolph v. USI Insurance Services, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv05467
Plaintiff:
Todd C. Randolph
Defendant:
USI Insurance Services, LLC and Anco Insurance Services of Houston, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USI INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC v. BARK et al
as 1:2019cv11810
Plaintiff:
USI Insurance Services LLC.
Defendant:
BRIAN D. BARK and Brown & Brown Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USI INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC v. BARK et al
as 2:2019cv03618
Plaintiff:
USI INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
BRIAN D. BARK and BROWN & BROWN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05997
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Doe v. Paychex, Inc.
as 19-1760
Defendant / Appellee:
Paychex, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
USI Insurance Services LLC and USI Insurance Services of Connecticut, Inc.
RMI HOLDINGS v. ASPEN AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 5:2019cv00153
Defendant:
Aspen American Insurance Company, ORM, Inc., ORM MERRITT ISLAND INC and others
Plaintiff:
RMI Holdings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USI Insurance Services v. Craig, et al
as 19-8029
Plaintiff / Appellant:
USI INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAD CRAIG and WYOMING FINANCIAL INSURANCE, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
