Cases 61 - 70 of 75
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rita Hopkins v. World Acceptance Corporation, et al
as 11-13409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RITA HOPKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
WORLD ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, WORLD FINANCE CORPORATION OF GEORGIA, FORTEGRA FINANCIAL CORPORTION, f.k.a. Life of the South Corportation and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Turbyfill et al
as 6:2011cv00144
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Candy Turbyfill, Keith Allen Turbyfill, World Finance Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Atkins v. World Finance Corporation et al
as 6:2011cv00067
Plaintiff:
Pam Atkins
Defendant:
World Finance Corporation and Zanobia Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hopkins v. World Acceptance Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv03429
Plaintiff:
Rita Hopkins
Defendant:
World Acceptance Corporation , World Finance Corporation of Georgia , Fortegra Financial Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv03199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
