Cases 61 - 70 of 165
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv14180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Kaba et al v. American Eagle Express, Inc.
as 8:2015cv00167
Plaintiff:
Abdourahaman Kaba and Dieudonne Kabore
Defendant:
American Eagle Express, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
American Eagle Express, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Abdourahaman Kaba and Dieudonne Kabore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fogg Filler Company v. Kaba Ilco Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv01193
Plaintiff:
Fogg Filler Company
Defendant:
Kaba Ilco Corporation and McMaster-Carr Supply Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Kaba v. Republic National Recovery et al
as 1:2014cv08551
Plaintiff:
Adrian Kaba
Defendant:
Republic National Recovery and John Does
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Zvonko et al v. Eli's Bread, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv08105
Plaintiff:
Zoric Zvonko , Stevan Obradovic , Jensey Jorge and others
Defendant:
Eli's Bread, Inc. and Eli Zabar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv06428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Natu Bah, et al v. Atty Gen of the State of TN, et al
as 14-5861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATU BAH, DIARIOU DIALLO, AMINATA KABA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE, LINDA COLEY, NINA COPPINGER and others
Kaba v. Holder
as 14-1100
Petitioner:
Mohamed Jean Aboulaye Kaba, AKA Charlie
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
O.S. Security LLC v. Kaba Ilco Corp. et al
as 8:2014cv00316
Defendant:
Kaba Holding AG and Kaba Ilco Corp.
Plaintiff:
O.S. Security LLC
Bah et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2013cv02789
Plaintiff:
Natu Bah , Diariou Diallo , Aminata Kaba and others
Defendant:
State Of Tennessee, Attorney General of the State of Tennessee and Tennessee State Board of Cosmetology
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
