Cases 61 - 70 of 79
Michael Pierce v. E. Sealey, et al
as 13-5136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
E. SEALEY, Officer and OFFICER PARNELL
Foudy et al v. Saint Lucie County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2012cv14462
Plaintiff:
Toni Foudy and Shaun Foudy
Defendant:
Saint Lucie County Sheriffs Office, Indian River County Sheriffs Office, Gerald M. Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierce v. Sealey et al
as 3:2012cv00565
Plaintiff:
Michael Pierce
Defendant:
E Sealey and Parnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act
USA v. Damien Pierce
as 12-15105
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAMIEN MICHAEL PIERCE, a.k.a. Mike
Michael Pierce v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 12-13998
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL PIERCE
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Pames v. Pierce
as 1:2012cv00285
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Pames
Defendant:
Michael Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2011cv01011
Petitioner:
Michael Pierce
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce et al v. Rosetta Stone, Ltd.
as 3:2011cv01283
Plaintiff:
Michael Pierce and Patrick Gould
Defendant:
Rosetta Stone, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Thomas Pierce v. Rick Thaler, Director, et al
as 10-10978
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS MICHAEL PIERCE
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and CHARLES RYAN, Director, Arizona State Prison
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
