Cases 71 - 80 of 1,046
Barrett v. Louck-Davis et al
as 4:2023cv04028
Plaintiff:
Donnie R Barrett
Defendant:
Amy Louck-Davis and Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. Derick Dermatology et al
as 1:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Theresa Maldonado
Defendant:
Derick Dermatology, Amy Derick, Libby Slasburg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Teague v. Red Sky Consulting, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
Amy Teague
Defendant:
Red Sky Consulting, LLC and Sean Donovan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
USA v. Shannon et al
as 3:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Christopher W. Shannon, Amy Lynn Shannon and City of Marshall, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Lewis v. Kalbhen et al
as 1:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Amy M. Lewis
Defendant:
Janet Kalbhen and Vantius, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Batteau v. State of Texas
as 3:2022cv03147
Plaintiff:
Sara J. Batteau
Defendant:
Gregg Abbott, Ken Paxton, Texas Department of Family Protective Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hines v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv03152
Plaintiff:
Amy Hines
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv50447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Geiken v. Patel et al
as 3:2022cv50442
Plaintiff:
Timothy Roy Geiken
Defendant:
Satish Patel, Shannie, Andrew Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
