Cases 71 - 80 of 102,497
Lewis, Daniel v. Stafford, Bridgette et al
as 3:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Daniel F.W. Lewis
Defendant:
Bridgette L. Stafford, Rey R. Palop, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Show Off Transport LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03335
Plaintiff:
Danielle Reid
Defendant:
Show Off Transport LLC and Jevon Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Arriaga et al v. McDermott International, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00749
Plaintiff:
Anna Arriaga, Jonathan Bethancourt, Larry Bigelow and others
Defendant:
McDermott International Inc and C B & I L L C
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Zito v. Martuscello et al
as 9:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Louis Emilio Zito
Defendant:
Daniel F. Martuscello and Andrew Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Fleischman et al
as 2:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
John Edwin Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Daniel Fleischman, Randy Smith, J Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2024cv02428
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN TERRELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
DANIELS, WALSTON and SURGI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Gilman v. Samuel Byrd, et al
as 24-1951
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. GILMAN
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, M.D., CHELSEY PEARISON, R.N., BARBARA RIGGS, R.N. and others
Lizarraga, et al. v. NSO Group Technologies Limited, et al.
as 24-3463
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LIZARRAGA, CARLOS DADA, SERGIO ARAUZ and others
Defendant:
NSO GROUP TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED and Q CYBER TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Fogel v. Hall et al
as 7:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brian Fogel
Defendant:
Major T. Hall, Warden Jeffrey Artrip, Assistant Warden J.H. Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel James Harper v. C. Chetman
as 2:2024cv04622
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
C. Chetman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
