Cases 71 - 80 of 167
Thomas v. Pfister et al
as 1:2018cv04311
Plaintiff:
Donzell Thomas
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Ann Lahr, Don Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pullen v. Mohr et al
as 1:2018cv00386
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Pullen
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, Ron Erdos, Crabtree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yvelan Pierre v. D. Padgett, et al
as 18-12276
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YVELAN PIERRE, Department of Corrections Officer
Defendant - Appellee:
D. PADGETT, Department of Corrections Officer, J. SLAUGHTER, Department of Corrections Officer, J. LAHR, Department of Corrections Officer and others
Van Ballegooyen v. Dauguaard et al
as 4:2018cv04051
Plaintiff:
Dawn Van Ballegooyen
Defendant:
Dennis Dauguaard , Denny Kaemingk , Daniel Mart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson #748757 v. Powell et al
as 1:2018cv00466
Plaintiff:
Douglas Cornell Jackson #748757
Defendant:
Heather Powell, Heidi Washington, Unknown Brant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Butler et al
as 1:2018cv01149
Plaintiff:
Byron E Porter
Defendant:
Kimberly Butler, Sarah Johnson, Ann Lahr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eastman v. Santos et al
as 3:2018cv00602
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey H. Eastman
Defendant:
Venerio Santos, Robert Mueller, Warden Kink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yvelan Pierre v. D. Padgett, et al
as 18-10939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YVELAN PIERRE
Defendant - Appellee:
D. PADGETT, Department of Corrections Officer, J. SLAUGHTER, Department of Corrections Officer, J. LAHR, Department of Corrections Officer and others
Mack v. Walker et al
as 3:2018cv00507
Plaintiff:
Carl Mack
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Walker, Chaplain, Ann Lahr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Preston #235170 v. Smith et al
as 1:2018cv00084
Plaintiff:
Harvey Preston #235170
Defendant:
Willie Smith, Roger Gerlach, Unknown Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
