Cases 71 - 80 of 105
Broussard v. USA
as 1:2013cv00873
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alced Broussard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lufthansa Cargo AG v. Allied New York Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02901
Defendant:
Allied Aviation, Allied Aviation Company of New York, Inc., Allied Aviation Fueling of National Airport, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lufthansa Cargo AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
S. Tous S.L. v. Acosta, et al.
as 3:2013cv01383
Plaintiff:
S. Tous S.L.
Defendant:
Dionisio Acosta, Ramon Acosta, ALC Distributors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Lawrence Cohn LLC v. HMSA BSH et al
as 2:2012cv04172
Defendant:
HMSA BSH and Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association
Plaintiff:
Lawrence W. Cohn, AAL, ALC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Mack v. Deere & Company et al
as 3:2012cv00296
Plaintiff:
Abe Mack, Jr
Defendant:
Deere & Company and Shoppas Farms Supply a/k/a Shoppas ALC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stokes v. ALC of New York LLC
as 1:2012cv07379
Plaintiff:
Akua Stokes
Defendant:
ALC of New York LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership vs. ALC CVMA, LLC, et al
as 1:2012cv03107
Plaintiff:
Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership
Defendant:
ALC CVMA, LLC , ALC GGMG, LLC , ALC HTIF, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Johnson v. ALC of New York LLC
as 7:2011cv06978
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Johnson
Defendant:
ALC of New York LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
