Cases 71 - 80 of 960
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Zhang v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 3:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Ryan Zhang
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Milkes et al v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 1:2024cv02337
Plaintiff:
Michael Milkes and Shari C. White
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Amazon.com Inc et al v. Bakan et al
as 2:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com Inc, Amazon.com Services LLC, Seiko Epson Corporation and others
Defendant:
Muammer Bakan, Osman Cellik, Mustafa Cenan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Lin v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 5:2024cv01549
Plaintiff:
Tao Lin
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Martinez v. Amazon.com Services, LLC
as 5:2024cv01367
Plaintiff:
Cecilia Martinez
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jiangxo Zhengao Recycled Textile Co., Ltd. v. Amazon.com Services, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03434
Petitioner:
Jiangxo Zhengao Recycled Textile Co., Ltd.
Respondent:
Amazon.com Services, LLC and Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 203 Jurisdiction; amount in controversy
AlmondNet, Inc. et al, v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
AlmondNet, Inc. and Datonics LLC,
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc., Amazon.com Services LLC and Amazon Web Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
