Cases 71 - 80 of 92
Hill v. Dodge Motor Company
as 4:2012cv00311
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hill
Defendant:
Dodge Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Latimore v. NBC Universal Incorporated
as 12-1385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sonya Whitten Latimore
Defendant:
Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Andrew Hill, an individual, Shine Limited, an entity of unknown origin and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NBC Universal Inc., Reveille, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and Kim Fuller
Andrew Hill v. Unknown Alvarez, et al
as 11-1797
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN ALVAREZ and UNKNOWN CHICK
Defendant:
KENNETH MCKEE, Warden, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, B. NOVAK and others
Hill v. Sheriff's Department
as 4:2011cv00403
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hill
Defendant:
Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. City of Arlington
as 4:2011cv00369
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hill
Defendant:
City of Arlington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Cleveland Cavaliers
as 4:2011cv00351
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hill
Defendant:
Cleveland Cavaliers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Star Telegram
as 4:2011cv00278
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hill
Defendant:
Star Telegram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latimore v. NBC Universal Inc. et al
as 11-1202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sonya Whitten Latimore
Defendant:
NBC Universal Television Studio, 3 Ball Productions, Inc., Twentieth Television, Inc, a Delware Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NBC Universal Inc., Reveille, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Ben Silverman, an individual and others
Hill v. Smith et al
as 2:2011cv00026
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
D.B. Smith, Richard Davis, III and Commonwealth State of VA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
