Cases 71 - 80 of 336
Lamothe v. Moran
as 21-2295
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Lamothe and Michael Lamothe, Derivatively on behalf of LIFE PARTNERS HOLDINGS, INC
Defendant / Appellee:
H. Thomas Moran, Jessica McGee, David M. Bennett and others
Defendant:
Thomas & Knight, LLP, Mark Redus, Philip Loy and others
Franklin Wilson v. Matthew Atchley
as 21-71354
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN JASPER WILSON
Respondent:
MATTHEW ATCHLEY, Warden
Harris v. Atchley et al
as 3:2021cv06577
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jay Harris
Defendant:
Warden Matthew Atchley, Kathleen Allison, T. Vang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Atchley et al
as 5:2021cv06929
Plaintiff:
Darnell Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Atchley and Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsey Lacey v. Matthew Atchley
as 2:2021cv07838
Petitioner:
Lindsey Lacey
Respondent:
Matthew Atchley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shikeb Saddozai v. A. Carwithen, et al
as 21-16284
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHIKEB SADDOZAI
Defendant / Appellee:
M. B. ATCHLEY, Warden, DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CONTROL TOWER OFFICER and others
ATCHLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv51777
Plaintiff:
RALPH ETHAN ATCHLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Atchley et al v. Valais Ventures LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01301
Plaintiff:
Derek Atchley and Brendan Stringer
Defendant:
Valais Ventures LLC, Kingston Botanicals LLC, Dr. Phill's Pharma LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mitchell v. Atchley
as 4:2021cv06176
Petitioner:
Correy Mitchell
Respondent:
Matthew Atchley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Overland v. Synergies3 TEC Services, LLC
as 4:2021cv01008
Plaintiff:
Talon Overland, Daniel Murphy, Mike Baker and others
Defendant:
Synergies3 TEC Services, LLC, Benton Odom and Eric Atchley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
