Cases 71 - 80 of 321
COLTON v. AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01369
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH COLTON
Defendant:
AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC. and WAYNE SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlton v. Avis Budget Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00485
Defendant:
Avis Budget Group, Inc., Kia Motors America, Inc., Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Carlton, Jordan Carlton and Rebecca Carlton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv01416
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SUTTON v. AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC. et al
as 9:2019cv81060
Plaintiff:
TRACEY SUTTON
Defendant:
AVIS BUDGET CAR RENTAL, LLC. and AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
RFC Lenders of Texas, LLC v. Zipcar, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00414
Defendant:
Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC, Avis Budget Group Inc. and Zipcar, Inc.
Plaintiff:
RFC Lenders of Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Veronica Smith v. Budget Rent A Car System, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04720
Plaintiff:
Veronica Smith
Defendant:
Budget Rent A Car System, Inc., AVIS Budget Group, Inc., Does 1 to 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Brodsky v. Zipcar, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv11188
Plaintiff:
Jay Brodsky
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, AVIS Budget Group,Inc and Zipcar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02616
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Donelson v. Avis/Budget Group et al
as 2:2019cv00105
Defendant:
City of Amarillo, Texas, Undisclosed Parties and Avis/Budget Group
Plaintiff:
Rusty Donelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meza v. United States of America et al
as 4:2019cv00823
Defendant:
PV HOLDING CORP D/B/A AVIS BUDGET GROUP, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Plaintiff:
SANTIAGO MEZA
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
