Cases 71 - 80 of 100
Fabec v. PopSockets LLC et al
as 1:2026cv03073
Plaintiff:
Louis Francis Fabec
Defendant:
PopSockets LLC, David Barnett, Walmart Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Barnette-Kruger v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 2:2026cv04123
Petitioner:
Andrew Lawrence Barnette-Kruger
Respondent:
Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnett v. Doe
as 1:2026cv00124
Plaintiff:
Dewey A. Barnett
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Barnett et al v. United Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2026cv06352
Plaintiff:
Debra Barnett and Lance Barnett
Defendant:
United Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Gilstrap v. Bedford et al
as 1:2026cv02974
Plaintiff:
Sammy Eugene Gilstrap
Defendant:
Kelsi Bedford, Sheriff Craig Owens and Judge Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00369
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Barnett v. Hancock et al
as 1:2026cv00120
Plaintiff:
Dewey A Barnett
Defendant:
Gregory Hancock, Karasea Moody, Crystal Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00366
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bankruptcy Trading & Investments LLC v. Barnett
as 3:2026cv01727
Plaintiff:
Bankruptcy Trading & Investments LLC
Defendant:
Robert Barnett
Judge:
Stacey G Jernigan
Participant:
Case Admin Sup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Barnett v. Sharp
as 4:2026cv00313
Petitioner:
Christopher J Barnett
Respondent:
Tommy Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
