Cases 71 - 80 of 96
LeJonathan Cox v. Chuck Biscoe, et al
as 11-40763
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEJONATHAN E COX
Respondent - Appellee:
CHUCK BISCOE, SHARON L. CARLILE and JANE DOE
Biscoe v. Garcia et al
as 2:2011cv00943
Plaintiff:
Donna Marie Biscoe
Defendant:
Unknown Garcia, Unknown Robles, Unknown Butticci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Northup v. Bell et al
as 6:2011cv00222
Plaintiff:
Kirk John Northup
Defendant:
Oliver Bell, Brad Livingston, Kelvin Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. Biscoe et al
as 6:2010cv00418
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lynn Townsend
Defendant:
Chuck Biscoe, Mike Owens, S St 'Pe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Anderson v. Chuck Biscoe, et al
as 10-40650
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY A. ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHUCK BISCOE, KEVIN SANDERS and STEPHEN HURT
Ronnie Barber v. Nathaniel Quarterman, et al
as 10-40495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE WAYNE BARBER
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, CHUCK BISCOE, Senior Warden, ROBERT HERRERA, Assistant Warden and others
Anderson v. Biscoe et al
as 6:2010cv00035
Plaintiff:
Rodney A Anderson
Defendant:
Chuck I Biscoe, Kevin Sanders and Stephen Hurt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Barker et al
as 6:2009cv00507
Plaintiff:
Michael D Butler
Defendant:
Rhonda A Barker, Chuck I Biscoe, Robert D Hererra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Biscoe et al
as 6:2009cv00486
Plaintiff:
LeJonathan E Cox
Defendant:
Chuck Biscoe, Sharon L Carlile and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blanton v. Biscoe
as 1:2009cv00769
Petitioner:
Elgin Wayne Blanton
Respondent:
Chuck Biscoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
