Cases 71 - 80 of 783
Corey Hood v. Bureau of Prisons
as 23-6114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COREY DEANDRE HOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, BELLAMY, Lieutenant, OFFICER WHITE, R&D Officer and others
CAUDILL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03349
Plaintiff:
PRESTON WADE CAUDILL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CAUDILL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01632
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CAUDILL, II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Robison et al
as 2:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
David K. Williams
Defendant:
Gene Robison doing business as Robison Homebuilders, Danny Ray Bowles, Natures Way and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Caudill v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq02929
Plaintiff:
Lorna Caudill
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv07659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Young v. House et al
as 4:2022cv04162
Plaintiff:
David C Young
Defendant:
Heather House, Sarah Hartman, Angela Caudill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Renfro v. Willow Tree Health Care Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00857
Plaintiff:
Clarissa Renfro
Defendant:
Willow Tree Health Care Group, Inc., Paul Caudill and Dan Menzer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
In re: 3M Company
as 22-0505
Petitioner:
In re: 3M COMPANY, fka Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company
Respondent:
BRIAN ADAMS, ALICE ADAMS, EDWARD ADAMS and others
Adkins et al v. Flash Market LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00858
Plaintiff:
Khurshonda Adkins, Elizabeth Alvarez, Jalyn Anthony and others
Defendant:
Flash Market LLC and PFMFC Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
