Cases 71 - 80 of 157
Jordan v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (JRG2)
as 2:2015cv00268
Plaintiff:
April D Jordan
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jordan v. Perceptive Advisors LLC et al
as 1:2015cv06994
Plaintiff:
J. D. Jordan
Defendant:
Perceptive Advisors LLC, Perceptive Life Sciences Master Fund Ltd., Bioedelmann LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
USA v. Delmar Jordan
as 15-3875
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DELMAR D. JORDAN
JORDAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv01260
Plaintiff:
BRIAN D. JORDAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Jordan v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv07701
Plaintiff:
Shawn D. Jordan
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jordan v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc
as 6:2015cv00790
Plaintiff:
James D Jordan
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc , Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as MN/0:15-cv-01487
Plaintiff:
Shawn D Jordan
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Jordan v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00935
Plaintiff:
Harry D. Jordan
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv01487
Plaintiff:
Shawn D Jordan
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jordan v. Barrett et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2015cv00135
Plaintiff:
LaToria D. Jordan
Defendant:
Bobby Barrett and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
