Cases 71 - 80 of 1,593
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Inocente Carlos Alvaro Zeta et al v. Unites States of America et al
as 2:2023cv10507
Plaintiff:
Inocente Carlos Alvaro Zeta and Maria Elena De La Cruz Barrera Quinones
Defendant:
Unites States of America and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
De La Cruz et al v. Crazy Buffet 88, Inc. d/b/a Crazy International Buffet et al
as 7:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Ernesto De La Cruz, Abraham Gonzalez, Geovanny Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Crazy Buffet 88, Inc. d/b/a Crazy International Buffet and Wen Bin Huang
De La Cruz v. Target Corporation
as 1:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
Maria De la Cruz
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Reiner v. Navarette, et al.
as 23-3993
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN REINER
Defendant / Appellee:
JORGE NAVARETTE, TOM ZHANG, TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE and others
Orrego v. Knipfing
as 23-7941
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN KNIPFING, Employer, STEPHANIEANNA JAMES-KNIPFING, Employer, Kevin James and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIDIA M. ORREGO, -
Avila-De La Cruz v. Garland
as 23-7919
Petitioner:
VICTOR AVILA-DE LA CRUZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Fields v. de la Cruz et al
as 2:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Summer Fields
Defendant:
Alejandro Basulto de la Cruz, Chicago Intermodal Transportation Inc. and Direct Chassislink, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
USA v. Rafael De La Cruz Jimenez
as 23-13909
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RAFAEL DANIEL DE LA CRUZ JIMENEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
