Cases 71 - 80 of 126
United States of America v. Barret (Gunter)
as 12-4663
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Christopher Barret, DBA Derrick Brown, AKA Sean Brown, AKA Mouthy, AKA The General, AKA Chris, AKA Solo, Kareem Forrest, AKA Dooley, AKA Kareem Forest, Ryan Anderson, AKA Dre and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Kerry Gunter, AKA Guns
Brown et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv06831
Plaintiff:
Derrick Brown , Dorothy Brown , Rodger Newton and others
Defendant:
The City of New York, Sean Drain, Joseph Petrelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick Brown v. USA
as 12-5957
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Stanga et al v. City of New York
as 1:2012cv06254
Plaintiff:
Paul Stanga , Christopher Jones , John Andersen and others
Defendant:
City of New York and Anthony Linzy
Petitioner:
Mark Crowley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Derrick Brown v. USA
as 12-5813
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Derrick Brown v. Mark Luttrell, Jr., et al
as 12-5811
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR., Former Sheriff, BILL OLDHAM, WILLIAM GIBBONS, District Attorney and others
Brown v. Russell
as 4:2012cv00438
Petitioner:
Derrick Brown
Respondent:
Terry Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
IN RE: CAMDEN POLICE CASES
as 1:2011cv01315
Plaintiff:
ALANDA FORREST , JEFFREY HICKS , FRANK SHAW and others
Defendant:
KEVIN PARRY, JASON STETSER, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Derrick Brown v. Christopher Epps, Commissioner, et al
as 11-60051
Petitioner - Appellee:
DERRICK BROWN, also known as Derrick Latory Brown
Respondent - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Brown v. Bledsoe
as 3:2010cv02611
Petitioner:
Derrick Brown
Respondent:
B.A. Bledsoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
