Cases 71 - 80 of 93
Meraz v. United States of America
as 7:2010cv08041
Petitioner:
Daniel Ortiz Meraz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ORTIZ v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72086
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ORTIZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Loya v. America et al
as 3:2010cv00241
Defendant:
United States of America and Daniel Ortiz
Plaintiff:
Miguel Loya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
ORTIZ v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv38871
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ORTIZ
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Daniel Ortiz, Jr. v. Anthony Patrick, et al
as 10-50349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ORTIZ, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY J. PATRICK, PHILLUP CLARK, JR. and BRIAN A POLLOCK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Velazquez-Colon et al v. Fuentes-Agostini et al
as 3:2010cv01097
Plaintiff:
Carmelo Velazquez-Colon, Carmelo Colon-Rivera, Orlando Colon-Velazquez and others
Defendant:
Jose Fuentes-Agostini, Pedro Toledo-Davila, Anibal Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2010cv00329
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel Ortiz, Daniel Ortiz and DLO Bar & Restaurant Corp.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984
USA v. Jesus Ortiz-Ortiz
as 09-51136
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JESUS DANIEL ORTIZ-ORTIZ
Ortiz v. Quarterman
as 4:2009cv01646
Petitioner:
Daniel Ortiz, Jr
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
