Cases 71 - 80 of 203
Steven Hughes v. Correct Care Solutions, et al
as 14-5795
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN ALAN HUGHES
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, MEDICAL STAFF and JAMES E. COLEMAN, JR., SCCC Director
Ricky Benson v. Mark Luttrell, Jr., et al
as 14-5750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BENSON, aka Rickey Benson
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR., Mayor, JAMES E. COLEMAN, JR., Director, TONYA BEASLEY, Grievance Supervisor and others
Coleman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 2:2014cv02199
Plaintiff:
Ray E Coleman
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Ricky Benson v. Shelby County Government, et al
as 14-5626
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELBY COUNTY GOVERNMENT, MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR., JAMES E. COLEMAN and others
COLEMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv02714
Plaintiff:
DARRYL E. COLEMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Benson v. Shelby County Government et al
as 2:2014cv02314
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
Shelby County Government, Mark H. Luttrell, Jr, James E. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Hailey et al
as 1:2014cv00798
Plaintiff:
Demond E Coleman
Defendant:
T Hailey, Wendy Culp, Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rifenbery et al v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00692
Plaintiff:
Ashley Rifenbery , Connie S.A. Beasley , Denise E. Breland and others
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc. , Organon Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., LLC , Organon International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mad Dogg Athletics Inc v. Spinsational LLC et al
as 2:2014cv02409
Defendant:
Barry E. Coleman and Spinsational LLC
Plaintiff:
Mad Dogg Athletics Inc
Harper v. Luttrell et al
as 2:2014cv02129
Plaintiff:
William Charles Harper
Defendant:
Mark H. Luttrell, Jr and James E. Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
