Cases 71 - 80 of 124
Abston v. USA
as 1:2014cv00505
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Frank James Abston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Oslzly et al v. Rosenblatt et al
as 1:2014cv03638
Defendant:
Bowery Residents Committee, INC, Cynthia Dukas, Marilyn Fulton and others
Plaintiff:
Frank James Oslzly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dade v. Winder
as 2:2014cv00081
Plaintiff:
Frank James Dade
Defendant:
James Winder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blasingame v. York et al
as 5:2013cv00348
Plaintiff:
Frank James Blasingame
Defendant:
Debra York, Michael Person, Ojiugo M Iko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank Blasingame v. Joy Jones, et al
as 13-3011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frank James Blasingame
Defendant - Appellee:
Joy Jones, Correctional Sergeant, Arkansas Dept. of Corrections, Delta Unit, James T. Banks, Head Warden, Arkansas Dept. of Corrections, Delta Unit, Raymond Naylor, Disciplinary Hearing Administrator, Arkansas Dept. of Corrections and others
Blasingame v. Jones et al
as 5:2013cv00253
Plaintiff:
Frank James Blasingame
Defendant:
Joy Jones, James T Banks, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dade v. Legal Defenders Association et al
as 2:2013cv00642
Plaintiff:
Frank James Dade
Defendant:
Legal Defenders Association and Sherry Valdez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green et al v. Erickson et al
as 3:2013cv00758
Plaintiff:
Carlos Green and Frank James
Defendant:
Jana Erickson, Michael D. Crews, D. Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Holland
as 6:2013cv00076
Petitioner:
Frank James Welch, Jr.
Respondent:
J.C. Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USA v. Frank Abston
as 12-13807
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANK JAMES ABSTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
