Cases 71 - 80 of 17,944
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosalind Holmes v. USA, et al
as 21-3206
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT STILES, Former City Council Member Councilman, individual and official capacity, JEFFREY BLACKWELL, Former Cincinnati Police Chief, individual and official capacity, JOSEPH CALIGIURI, Disciplinary Counsel, individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSALIND HOLMES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00142
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Georgia-Pacific Corporation, et al v. Julia Engblom, et al
as 21-70316
Petitioner:
ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, ESIS and GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION
Respondent:
JULIA A. ENGBLOM and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS
Georgia-Pacific, LLC v. GSD Trading USA, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00578
Defendant:
GSD Trading USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Georgia-Pacific, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
George Hawthorn v. Georgia Pacific Brewton, LLC, et al
as 21-10142
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA PACIFIC, LLC, GEORGIA PACIFIC BREWTON, LLC and GEORGIA PACIFIC, LLC SEVERANCE PLAN FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE HAWTHORN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv04017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Marie Patterson v. Georgia Pacific, LLC, et al
as 20-14146
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA PACIFIC, LLC and ALABAMA RIVER CELLULOSE, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE PATTERSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
