Cases 71 - 80 of 85
Williams v. United States of America
as 0:2009cv60880
Plaintiff:
Caleb Glenn Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Stevenson v. Williams
as 5:2009ct03097
Plaintiff:
Roger Stevenson
Defendant:
Glenn Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERGER v. BUCK'S COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE et al
as 2:2009cv02235
Plaintiff:
GLENN WILLIAM BERGER
Defendant:
BUCK'S COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE and DOYLESTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. USA
as 5:2009cv00632
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Glenn Williams
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Glenn William Puckett v. A-bex Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-73378
Defendant:
A-bex Corporation
Plaintiff:
Glenn William Puckett
Williams v. Gwinnett County et al
as 1:2009cv00453
Plaintiff:
Glenn Williams
Defendant:
Gwinnett County and Gwinnett County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beckham v. Nagel et al
as 5:2009ct03026
Plaintiff:
Michael Dwyane Beckham
Defendant:
Diane L. Nagel, Robert Owens, Glenn Williams and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. 2000 Homes Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00016
Plaintiff:
Glenn Williams
Defendant:
2000 Homes Inc., Ami Kozinoff, Mortgage Enterprise Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Michael Rankins v. Robert Smith
as 08-7624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RANKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT SMITH and GLENN WILLIAMS
PUCKETT v. A-BEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv73378
Plaintiff:
GLENN WILLIAM PUCKETT, GLENN WILLIAM PUCKETT, GLENN WILLIAM PUCKETT and others
Defendant:
A-BEX CORPORATION, A-BEX CORPORATION, GAF CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
ASBESTOS CORPORATION, LTD., ATLAS TURNER, INC., LAC D'AMIANTE DU QUEBEC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
