Cases 71 - 80 of 103
VON DER HAAR v. LIEBA et al
as 1:2014cv00247
Defendant:
MR. COMBS and SHERLANA LIEBA
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE VON DER HAAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lionel Mitchell v. Johannes Haar et al
as 2:2013cv08531
Defendant:
Johannes Haar, Johannes Haar, D. Nettleton and others
Plaintiff:
Lionel Mitchell
Antonelli v. Haar et al
as 1:2013cv08232
Plaintiff:
Michelle Antonelli
Defendant:
Robert Haar, M.D. and Haar Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Grimes et al v. Haar et al
as 3:2013cv00617
Defendant:
ACE American Insurance Company, EAN Holdings, LLC and Katherine Haar
Plaintiff:
Lillie Grimes and Shanitra Grimes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Andrews v. Haar et al
as 1:2013cv23349
Plaintiff:
Octavious B. Andrews
Defendant:
Ray Haar, Jermaine Brown, Metro Dade Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv00683
Defendant:
Choctow Archiving Enterprise, Michael A. Haar, PA-C and The United States of America
Plaintiff:
Sherron Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Hill et al v. New Orleans City et al
as 2:2013cv02463
Plaintiff:
Darrin Hill and Marie Hill
Defendant:
New Orleans City, Ronal Serpas, Arnesta Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William B. Look, Jr., et al v. City of Mountain View, et al
as 12-17762
Plaintiff:
JODY LYNN VON HAAR
Appellant:
WILLIAM B. LOOK, Jr., Esquire
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW, TONY VIEYRA, TY ZEMLOK and others
Harold Hunter v. J. Haar et al
as 2:2012cv08477
Defendant:
J. Bloxom, J. Bloxom, Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Hunter
Morrison v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp.
as 12-703
Petitioner:
SHERRY MORRISON, as Trustee on behalf of the Haar Family Trust and all others similarly situated
Respondent:
ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
