Cases 71 - 80 of 137
Azael Dythian Perales v. Virgin Mobile USA et al
as 8:2011cv01656
Defendant:
Jeff Auman, BBVA, BNP Paribas and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv05160
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 jr Judicial Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01163
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kabbaj et al v. Obama
as 1:2011cv23492
Plaintiff:
Younes Kabbaj and Omar Abdel Rahman
Defendant:
Barak H. Obama, George W. Bush, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Furtado v. U.S. District Court et al
as 8:2011cv02535
Plaintiff:
Edson Furtado
Defendant:
U.S. District Court, Circuit Court for Harford County, Circuit Court for Howard County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christensen v. Wiseman et al
as 1:2011cv01837
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Christensen
Defendant:
Russell B. Wiseman, Steven Eckstein, Shane M. Leuthold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perales et al v. United States Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2011cv02172
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Respondent:
United States Internal Revenue Service, USA, U.S. Federal Bureau Of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perales v. United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv22833
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
United States of America , BP, Amoco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00155
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Zamarripa v. Clinton et al
as 4:2011cv02343
Plaintiff:
Antonio Francis Zamarripa
Defendant:
Hillary R. Clinton , Susan Gowlishaw and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
