Cases 71 - 80 of 347
Price et al v. DJO, L.L.C. et al
as 3:2010cv01278
Defendant:
DJO, Incorporated, DJO, L.L.C. and I-Flow Corporation
Plaintiff:
Brian J. Price and Christine Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Burnett v. DJO LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02176
Plaintiff:
Angela L Burnett
Defendant:
DJO LLC , DJO Incorporated and I-Flow Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cloute, Joseph v. I-Flow Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00578
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Cloute
Defendant:
I-Flow Corporation, DJO, LLC, DJO Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Poe v. I-Flow Corporation et al
as 0:2010cv04146
Plaintiff:
Alaina Poe
Defendant:
I-Flow Corporation, DJO LLC and DJO, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grant et al v. I-Flow Corporation
as 8:2010cv02128
Plaintiff:
Kristine Grant and Steven Grant
Defendant:
I-Flow Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Price et al v. DJO, L.L.C. et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2010cv03994
Plaintiff:
Brian J. Price and Christine Price
Defendant:
DJO, L.L.C., DJO, Incorporated and I-Flow Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garrand et al v. I-Flow Corporation
as 8:2010cv01099
Plaintiff:
Bonnie A. Garrand and Michael B. Garrand
Defendant:
I-Flow Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rohlik v. I-FLOW CORPORATION
as 7:2010cv00173
Plaintiff:
Lissa M. Rohlik
Defendant:
I-FLOW CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coccodrilli v. I-Flow Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv01702
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Coccodrilli
Defendant:
I-Flow Corporation , DJO, LLC and DJO Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Blattman v. I-Flow Corporation et alDO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2010cv03361
Plaintiff:
Cynthia L. Blattman
Defendant:
I-Flow Corporation, DJO, LLC and DJO Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
