Cases 71 - 80 of 98
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01381
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kimbrel v. Comprehensive Medical Services Inc et al
as 2:2010cv03037
Plaintiff:
Sam Kimbrel
Defendant:
Comprehensive Medical Services Inc, Invacare Corporation and Universal Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gallardo v. Invacare Supply Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv03256
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Gallardo
Defendant:
Invacare Supply Group, Inc. and Invacare Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. Invacare Corporation
as 5:2010cv00126
Defendant:
Invacare Corporation
Plaintiff:
Howard Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cupery v. Apria Healthcare Inc et al
as 4:2010cv00377
Defendant:
Apria Healthcare Inc and Invacare Corporation
Plaintiff:
Andrew Cupery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HORON v. INVACARE CORPORATION
as 3:2010cv00127
Plaintiff:
JAMES HORON
Defendant:
INVACARE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Invacare Corporation v. Rochelle et al
as 5:2010fj00004
Plaintiff:
Invacare Corporation
Defendant:
Robert Dale Rochelle , Janelle Rochell , Med Tech of Branson LLC and others
Debtor:
Medical Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Invacare Corporation et al v. Home Med Plus, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00126
Plaintiff:
Invacare Corporation and Freedom Designs, Inc.
Defendant:
Home Med Plus, LLC, Home Med Plus, Inc., Ronald J. Loumeau and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Tinnell v. Invacare Corporation
as 1:2010cv00079
Petitioner:
Nicole Tinnell
Defendant:
Invacare Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Gibson et al v. Invacare Corporation et al
as 4:2009cv00182
Plaintiff:
Frances Gibson, Frances Gibson, Frances Gibson and others
Defendant:
Invacare Corporation and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
