Cases 71 - 80 of 280
Burgess v. City of Huntington et al
as 3:2021cv00582
Plaintiff:
Rocky Eugene Burgess
Defendant:
City of Huntington, Dakota Dishman, Officer Lawhon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kokinda v. Foster et al
as 3:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
Jason Steven Kokinda
Defendant:
Cprl. T.H. Foster, Ptlm. K.A. Shiflett, Cprl. S.P. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankins v. Carvajal et al
as 5:2021cv00453
Plaintiff:
Michael Rankins
Defendant:
Michael D. Carvajal, J. C. Petrucc, John or Jane Doe and others
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Greene v. Justice et al
as 5:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
Michael Jermaine Greene
Defendant:
Randolph County, Jim Justice, Betsy C. Jividen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Doe et al
as 2:2021cv00494
Plaintiff:
Andrew Miller
Defendant:
Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II and Jane Doe, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. City of Gauley Bridge et al
as 2:2021cv00491
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
The City of Gauley Bridge and Larry Allen Clay, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Feaster et al
as 5:2021cv00140
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Greene
Defendant:
Sidney Feaster, Governor Jim Justice, Randolph County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. PrimeCare Medical of West Virginia, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00447
Plaintiff:
Grover Adams
Defendant:
PrimeCare Medical of West Virginia, Inc., Melissa Bragg, Ashley Sturm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garner v. PrimeCare Medical of West Virginia, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00382
Defendant:
PrimeCare Medical of West Virginia, Inc., Dr. Alfred Baldera, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Brendon Tyre Garner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feather-Gorbey v. Vest et al
as 5:2021cv00354
Defendant:
Edwards, Vest, Fain and others
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
