Cases 71 - 80 of 210
Zielinski v. Annucci et al
as 9:2017cv01042
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Zielinski
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Michael Kirkpatrick and John Does 1-9
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alcantara et al v. Correale et al
as 2:2017cv05084
Plaintiff:
Adonay Pineda Alcantara, Karen Bonilla and Alba Mejia de Bonilla
Defendant:
P.O. Sean G. Correale, P.O. Jason M. Dodd, P.O. John Does 1-9 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Wang
as 17-2220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth King, Yien-Koo King, Soon Huat, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Andrew Wang, Shou-Kung Wang, Bao Wu Tang and others
Lamar Company, LLC v. Harrison County School District et al
as 1:2017cv00206
Plaintiff:
Lamar Company, LLC
Defendant:
Harrison County School District , Leonard Busby, III , Brant Busby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Baijnauth et al v. Allen et al
as 1:2017cv03952
Defendant:
Detective Gary Allen, P.O. John Does 1-9 and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Kevin Baijnauth, Meenakshi Baijnauth, Mona S. Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UN4 PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. JOHN DOES 1-9
as 2:2017cv02481
Plaintiff:
UN4 PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-9
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Kabbaj v. Simpson
as 17-1641
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Younes Kabbaj
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark S. Simpson, Brian K. Albro, John Does, 1-9 and others
LOVE v. JOHN DOES 1-9 et al
as 3:2017cv01036
Plaintiff:
KELVIN RAY LOVE
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-9, JOHN DOES 1-4, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Linlor v. Five9, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00218
Plaintiff:
James Linlor
Defendant:
Five9, Inc. and John Does #1-#9
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
FLYNN v. CSX CORPORATION et al
as 1:2016cv09115
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FLYNN
Defendant:
CSX CORPORATION, CSX TRANSPORATION, INC. , NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
