Cases 71 - 80 of 124
Williams v. City of Hobbs et al
as 2:2019cv01060
Defendant:
Isidro Mora, Josh Gordon, Alvin Mattocks and others
Plaintiff:
LaRon Jay Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Cedar County, Missouri et al
as 6:2019cv03243
Defendant:
Jay Williams, Garrett Lukenbill, Leon Dwerlkotte and others
Plaintiff:
Shane V Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv01388
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Vale v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv01866
Plaintiff:
Jason Vale
Defendant:
City of New York, Casey Thomas, "FNU" [First Name Unknown] Hastings` and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Smith et al
as 1:2017cv03593
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Lecon Scott
Defendant:
Neil A. Smith, Kenyatta Smith, Keven Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Equifax, Inc.
as 1:2017cv03449
Plaintiff:
Chris Brown , Daniel E. Oberst , Chad Roofener and others
Defendant:
Equifax, Inc. and TRUSTEDID, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Smith, et al.,
as 1:2017cv03182
Plaintiff:
Ricardo L. Scott
Defendant:
Neil A. Smith, Kenyatta Smith, Keven Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagienski, et al. v. Pepperwood Fund II, LP, et al.
as 4:2017cv02435
Plaintiff:
Sue Ellen Peglow , Frank Bagienski , Robert Batchelder and others
Defendant:
Larry Hannah , Giant Gray, Inc. , Ozzie Khalil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Etienne v. EBR-COA et al
as 3:2017cv00445
Defendant:
Trudy Bihm, Tasha Clark-Amar, EBR-COA and others
Plaintiff:
Emily Robertson Etienne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jolley v. San Juan County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2017cv00436
Plaintiff:
Jay William Jolley
Defendant:
San Juan County Adult Detention Center, FNU Haval, FNU Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
